Re: Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Steele
Subject Re: Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization
Date
Msg-id be239334-8570-fc17-d32d-ffcb39923b58@pgmasters.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization  (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: Re: Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Konstantin,

On 1/12/18 7:53 AM, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12.01.2018 03:40, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
>> wrote:
>>> * Konstantin Knizhnik (k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru) wrote:
>>>> Updated version of the patch is attached.
>>> This patch appears to apply with just a bit of fuzz and make check
>>> passes, so I'm not sure why this is currently marked as 'Waiting for
>>> author'.
>>>
>>> I've updated it to be 'Needs review'.  If that's incorrect, feel free to
>>> change it back with an explanation.
>> Hi Konstantin,
>>
>> /home/travis/build/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/src/backend/tcop/postgres.c:5249:
>>
>> undefined reference to `PortalGetHeapMemory'
>>
>> That's because commit 0f7c49e85518dd846ccd0a044d49a922b9132983 killed
>> PortalGetHeapMemory.  Looks like it needs to be replaced with
>> portal->portalContext.
>>
> Hi  Thomas,
> 
> Thank you very much for reporting the problem.
> Rebased version of the patch is attached.

This patch has received no review or comments since last May and appears
too complex and invasive for the final CF of PG11.

I don't think it makes sense to keep pushing a patch through CFs when it
is not getting reviewed.  I'm planning to mark this as Returned with
Feedback unless there are solid arguments to the contrary.

Thanks,
-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Online enabling of checksums
Next
From: Emre Hasegeli
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Improve geometric types