Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vik Fearing
Subject Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column
Date
Msg-id b8872fd9-c5d1-0480-aab2-a1f9e388c513@postgresfriends.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column  (Gilles Darold <gilles@migops.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column  (Gilles Darold <gilles@migops.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/17/21 11:01 PM, Gilles Darold wrote:
> 
>   - Add a check into SET UNEXPANDED code to verify that there is at
> least one column expanded.

What is the point of this?  Postgres allows column-less tables.

Both of these statements are valid:

 - CREATE TABLE nada ();
 - SELECT;
-- 
Vik Fearing



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gilles Darold
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make ENOSPC not fatal in semaphore creation