Just realized something...
On 2018/07/03 15:29, Amit Langote wrote:
> Sorry for jumping in late here. I have a comment on the patch.
>
> + /* if there are no partitions then treat this as non-inheritance case. */
> + if (partdesc->nparts == 0)
> + {
> + parentrte->inh = false;
> + return;
> + }
> +
>
> Why is this not near the beginning of expand_partitioned_rtentry()?
This one still stands I think.
> Also, ISTM, this code would be unreachable because
> expand_inherited_rtentry would not call here if the above if statement is
> true, no?
I forgot that expand_partitioned_rtentry() will recursively call itself if
a partition is itself a partitioned table, in which case the above code helps.
Thanks,
Amit
