Re: [HACKERS] Update comments in nodeModifyTable.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Etsuro Fujita
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Update comments in nodeModifyTable.c
Date
Msg-id b5700b3d-f51f-e8e1-d5a3-43cbed0b5680@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Update comments in nodeModifyTable.c  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Update comments in nodeModifyTable.c  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017/08/02 4:07, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Etsuro Fujita
> <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> Maybe I'm missing something, but I'm not sure that's a good idea because the
>> change says like we might have 'wholerow' only for the FDW case, but that
>> isn't correct because we would have 'wholerow' for a view as well. ISTM that
>> views should be one of the typical cases, so I'd like to propose to modify
>> the sentence starting with 'Typically' to something like this: "Typically,
>> this will be a 'ctid' or 'wholerow' attribute, but in the case of a foreign
>> data wrapper it might be a set of junk attributes sufficient to identify the
>> remote row."  What do you think about that?
> 
> Works for me.

I updated the patch that way.  Attached is a new version of the patch.

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgbench: Skipping the creating primary keys afterinitialization
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Support for Secure Transport SSL library on macOS as OpenSSL alternative