On 2017/03/08 1:34, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
>> On 2017/03/07 14:04, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Therefore, there should definitely be a partitioned table, hopefully with
>>> a less generic name than "p1", in the final regression DB state. Whether
>>> this particular one from alter_table.sql is a good candidate, I dunno.
>>> But let's not drop it without adding a better-thought-out replacement.
>>
>> OK, let's drop p1 in alter_table.sql. I think a partitioned table created
>> in insert.sql is a good candidate to keep around after having it renamed,
>> which patch 0003 does.
>
> Committed 0001.
>
> Committed 0002 and 0003 together.
Thanks.
Regards,
Amit
