Re: Planner question - "bit" data types - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: Planner question - "bit" data types
Date
Msg-id b42b73150909052236k6df2a87cq1f4dd5b7af9003a2@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Planner question - "bit" data types  (Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net>)
List pgsql-performance
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Karl Denninger<karl@denninger.net> wrote:
> There was a previous thread and I referenced it. I don't have the other one
> in my email system any more to follow up to it.
>
> I give up; the attack-dog crowd has successfully driven me off.  Ciao.

Another more standard sql approach is to push the flags out to a
subordinate table.  This is less efficient of course but now you get
to use standard join tactics to match conditions...


merlin

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Karl Denninger
Date:
Subject: Re: Planner question - "bit" data types
Next
From: Vincent de Phily
Date:
Subject: slow query : very simple delete, 100% cpu, nearly no disk activity