Re: Planner question - "bit" data types - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Karl Denninger
Subject Re: Planner question - "bit" data types
Date
Msg-id 4AA2FFF8.6070806@denninger.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Planner question - "bit" data types  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Planner question - "bit" data types  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Re: Planner question - "bit" data types  ("Fernando Hevia" <fhevia@ip-tel.com.ar>)
Re: Planner question - "bit" data types  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
There was a previous thread and I referenced it. I don't have the other one in my email system any more to follow up to it.

I give up; the attack-dog crowd has successfully driven me off.  Ciao.

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Karl Denninger escribió: 
Tom Lane wrote:   
 
You never showed us any EXPLAIN results,     
Yes I did.  Go back and look at the archives.  I provided full EXPLAIN
and EXPLAIN ANALYZE results for the original query.  Sheesh.   
You did?  Where?  This is your first message in this thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2009-09/msg00059.php
No EXPLAINs anywhere to be seen.
 
Attachment

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Planner question - "bit" data types
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: Planner question - "bit" data types