Re: Planner question - "bit" data types - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Fernando Hevia
Subject Re: Planner question - "bit" data types
Date
Msg-id D14F56777F4E473C956E16C28521696E@iptel.com.ar
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Planner question - "bit" data types  (Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net>)
List pgsql-performance

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Karl Denninger
> Enviado el: Sábado, 05 de Septiembre de 2009 21:19
> Para: Alvaro Herrera
> CC: Tom Lane; Merlin Moncure; Josh Berkus;
> pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
> Asunto: Re: [PERFORM] Planner question - "bit" data types
>
> There was a previous thread and I referenced it. I don't have
> the other one in my email system any more to follow up to it.
>
> I give up; the attack-dog crowd has successfully driven me off.  Ciao.
>
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
>     Karl Denninger escribió:
>
>
>         Tom Lane wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>             You never showed us any EXPLAIN results,
>
>
>         Yes I did.  Go back and look at the archives.
> I provided full EXPLAIN
>         and EXPLAIN ANALYZE results for the original
> query.  Sheesh.
>
>
>
>     You did?  Where?  This is your first message in this thread:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2009-09/msg00059.php
>     No EXPLAINs anywhere to be seen.
>

I guess this is the post Karl refers to:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-sql/2009-08/msg00088.php

Still you can't hope that others will recall a post 2 weeks ago, with an
other subject and in an other list!



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Using Gprof with Postgresql
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Planner question - "bit" data types