Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Speed up CREATE DATABASE by deferring the fsyncs until after - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From marcin mank
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Speed up CREATE DATABASE by deferring the fsyncs until after
Date
Msg-id b1b9fac61002150334k25a4977aj1f73e9dbcc2279a@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Speed up CREATE DATABASE by deferring the fsyncs until after  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Speed up CREATE DATABASE by deferring the fsyncs until after
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Speed up CREATE DATABASE by deferring the fsyncs until after
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Hi Marcin,
>
> Sounds rather unlikely to me. Its likely handled at an upper layer (vfs in linux' case) and only overloaded when an
optimizedimplementation is available. 
> Which os do you see implementing that only on a part of the filesystems?
>

I have a Windows XP dev machine, which runs virtualbox, which runs
ubuntu, which mounts a windows directory through vboxfs

fsync does error out on directories inside that mount.

btw: 8.4.2 initdb won`t work there too, So this is not a regression.
The error is:
DEBUG:  creating and filling new WAL file
LOG:  could not link file "pg_xlog/xlogtemp.2367" to
"pg_xlog/000000010000000000000000" (initialization of log file 0,
segment 0): Operation not permitted
FATAL:  could not open file "pg_xlog/000000010000000000000000" (log
file 0, segment 0): No such file or directory

But I would not be that sure that eg. NFS or something like that won`t complain.

Ignoring the return code seems the right choice.

Greetings
Marcin Mańk


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zdenek Kotala
Date:
Subject: Re: buildfarm breakage
Next
From: Joachim Wieland
Date:
Subject: Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY and notification timing guarantees