Re: Rejecting weak passwords - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From marcin mank
Subject Re: Rejecting weak passwords
Date
Msg-id b1b9fac60909281449l2d0cb757y5f097010bb1dba54@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rejecting weak passwords  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Rejecting weak passwords
Re: Rejecting weak passwords
List pgsql-hackers
> The case that ENCRYPTED
> protects against is database superusers finding out other users'
> original passwords, which is a security issue to the extent that those
> users have used the same/similar passwords for other systems.

I just want to note that md5 is not much of a protection against this
case these days. Take a look at this:
http://www.golubev.com/hashgpu.htm

It takes about 32 hours to brute force all passwords from [a-zA-Z0-9]
of up to 8 chars in length.

Maybe it is time to look at something like bcrypt.
http://chargen.matasano.com/chargen/2007/9/7/enough-with-the-rainbow-tables-what-you-need-to-know-about-s.html

Greetings
Marcin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira
Date:
Subject: Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review)
Next
From: Bernd Helmle
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings