Re: Rejecting weak passwords - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Rejecting weak passwords
Date
Msg-id 16091.1254180412@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rejecting weak passwords  (marcin mank <marcin.mank@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
marcin mank <marcin.mank@gmail.com> writes:
>> The case that ENCRYPTED
>> protects against is database superusers finding out other users'
>> original passwords, which is a security issue to the extent that those
>> users have used the same/similar passwords for other systems.

> I just want to note that md5 is not much of a protection against this
> case these days. Take a look at this:
> http://www.golubev.com/hashgpu.htm

> It takes about 32 hours to brute force all passwords from [a-zA-Z0-9]
> of up to 8 chars in length.

Yeah, but that will find you a password that hashes to the same thing.
Not necessarily the same password.  It'll get you into the Postgres
DB just fine, which you don't care about because you're already a
superuser there.  It won't necessarily get you into the assumed
third-party systems.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Cathy Mullican
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DefaultACLs
Next
From: Itagaki Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Re: Buffer usage in EXPLAIN and pg_stat_statements (review)