On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> Actually, later models of linux have a direct RAID-10 level built in.
> I haven't used it. Not sure how it would look in /proc/mdstat either.
I think I actively block memory of that because the UI on it is so cryptic
and it's been historically much more buggy than the simpler RAID0/RAID1
implementaions. But you're right that it's completely possible Ow used
it. Would explain not being able to figure out what's going on too.
There's a good example of what the result looks like with failed drives in
one of the many bug reports related to that feature at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/intrepid/+source/linux/+bug/285156 and I
liked the discussion of some of the details here at
http://robbat2.livejournal.com/231207.html
The other hint I forgot to mention is that you should try:
mdadm --examine /dev/XXX
For each of the drives that still works, to help figure out where they fit
into the larger array. That and --detail are what I find myself using
instead of /proc/mdstat , which provides an awful interface IMHO.
--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
