> Now the overhead is really 60-65%. Although the specification is unambiguous,
> but we still need some maths to know whether it fits in buffers or memory...
> The point of Karel regression is to take this into account.
>
> Also, whether this option would be more admissible to Tom is still an open
> question. Tom?
Here is a version with this approach: the documentation talks about
"actual data size, without overheads", and points out that storage
overheads are typically an additional 65%.
--
Fabien.
