On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hmm, and what is shared_buffers set to? How big are the tables and
> other indexes used in the query? We still have to explain why the
> inner nestloop got slower, and it's hard to see that unless something
> stopped fitting in cache.
I just noticed that someone has started running a big java program (6GB
RAM so far) on that machine. Maybe it was running during the bad run. I'll
see if I can re-run those two queries later on when the machine is idle.
shared_buffers = 500MB
Location table: 336 MB
Gene table: 124 MB
Primer table: 103 MB
location__key_all index: 334 MB
Matthew
--
For those of you who are into writing programs that are as obscure and
complicated as possible, there are opportunities for... real fun here
-- Computer Science Lecturer
