Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

16 April 2009

• 06:42   Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans? Lists
• 08:12   Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans? Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
• 10:37   Really dumb planner decision Matthew Wakeling
• 10:48   Re: Really dumb planner decision Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
• 11:16   Re: Really dumb planner decision Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
• 11:24   Re: Really dumb planner decision Matthew Wakeling
• 11:31   Re: Really dumb planner decision Matthew Wakeling
• 11:42   Re: Really dumb planner decision Robert Haas
• 12:05   Re: Really dumb planner decision Matthew Wakeling
• 12:06   Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans? Merlin Moncure
• 12:11   Re: Really dumb planner decision Merlin Moncure
• 13:49   Re: Really dumb planner decision Tom Lane
• 14:11   Re: Really dumb planner decision Kevin Grittner
• 14:49   Re: Really dumb planner decision Merlin Moncure
• 15:37   Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans? Tom Lane
• 15:43   Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans? Tom Lane
• 15:49   Re: Really dumb planner decision Robert Haas
• 15:52   Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans? Lists
• 15:54   Re: Really dumb planner decision Matthew Wakeling
• 16:01   Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans? Tom Lane
• 16:04   Re: Really dumb planner decision Tom Lane
• 16:06   GiST index performance Matthew Wakeling
• 16:33   Re: GiST index performance Kevin Grittner
• 16:38   Re: GiST index performance Matthew Wakeling
• 16:57   Re: GiST index performance Tom Lane
• 17:23   Re: GiST index performance Matthew Wakeling
• 17:26   Re: GiST index performance dforum
• 17:52   Re: GiST index performance Tom Lane
• 17:54   Re: GiST index performance Matthew Wakeling
• 17:59   Re: GiST index performance Tom Lane
• 18:05   Re: GiST index performance Matthew Wakeling
• 23:09   No hash join across partitioned tables? Kris Jurka
• 23:12   Re: No hash join across partitioned tables? Tom Lane
• 23:30   Re: No hash join across partitioned tables? Kris Jurka