On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 01:53:06PM -0700, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> It seems okay to me to commit it to HEAD as it's a cosmetic change and
> improves the consistency between v18 and 19.
Right. It looks confusing to leave these at 0 rather than NULL as
they mean a pointer, for the same reasons as what you have documented
in 5fe08c006c82. Doing that now or waiting for v19 does not make much
difference. Anyway, there's always the less-noise-when-backpatching
argument, so if you apply that now on HEAD that's fine IMO.
--
Michael
