Re: a couple of small cleanup patches for DSM-related code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 12:48 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 0001 changes test_dsm_registry.c to use PG_GETARG_INT32 and
> PG_RETURN_INT32.  The installation script and the C code both used signed
> integers, so I'm not sure why I used PG_GETARG/RETURN_UINT32 in commit
> 8b2bcf3.  I'm planning to back-patch this one to v17, where the DSM
> registry was first introduced.

+1

> 0002 follows commit 5fe08c0's example and changes some calls to
> dshash_attach() and dsa_create_in_place() to use NULL instead of 0 for
> pointer arguments.  I don't see any need to back-patch this one, but I also
> don't see any need to wait for v19devel to commit it.

It seems okay to me to commit it to HEAD as it's a cosmetic change and
improves the consistency between v18 and 19.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com