Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. information_schema - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. information_schema
Date
Msg-id a6e16241-8008-bec6-8254-1f0f8cb24be6@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. information_schema  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. information_schema  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 1/18/17 2:32 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> Unless we can find something official, I suppose we should just
> display BASE TABLE in that case as we do in other cases.  I wonder if
> the schema needs some broader revision; for example, are there
> information_schema elements intended to show information about
> partitions?

Is it intentional that we show the partitions by default in \d,
pg_tables, information_schema.tables?  Or should we treat those as
somewhat-hidden details?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] COPY as a set returning function