Re: Loaded footgun open_datasync on Windows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: Loaded footgun open_datasync on Windows
Date
Msg-id a3c9a12d4d146174b7fc3a742bd8f06278a20b78.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Loaded footgun open_datasync on Windows  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: Loaded footgun open_datasync on Windows
List pgsql-hackers
Noah Misch wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:09:24PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > > I have added it to the July commitfest.
> > > 
> > > Have you looked at the possibility of removing the log file constraints
> > > in pg_upgrade with the change you are doing here so as things would be
> > > more consistent with non-Windows platforms, simplifying some code on the
> > > way?
> > 
> > Can you explain what the "log file constraints" are?
> > If it is in any way related, and I can handle it, sure.
> 
> See this comment in pg_upgrade.h:
> 
> /*
>  * WIN32 files do not accept writes from multiple processes
>  *
>  * On Win32, we can't send both pg_upgrade output and command output to the
>  * same file because we get the error: "The process cannot access the file
>  * because it is being used by another process." so send the pg_ctl
>  * command-line output to a new file, rather than into the server log file.
>  * Ideally we could use UTILITY_LOG_FILE for this, but some Windows platforms
>  * keep the pg_ctl output file open by the running postmaster, even after
>  * pg_ctl exits.
>  *
>  * We could use the Windows pgwin32_open() flags to allow shared file
>  * writes but is unclear how all other tools would use those flags, so
>  * we just avoid it and log a little differently on Windows;  we adjust
>  * the error message appropriately.
>  */
> 
> If you grep src/bin/pg_upgrade for WIN32, roughly a third of the hits are
> workarounds for this problem.  I agree with Michael that removing those
> workarounds would be a good test of frontend pgwin32_open() and worth
> including in the initial commit.

Thank you for the explanation.

I didn't get pg_upgrade to work without the log file hacks; I suspect that there
is more than just log file locking going on, but my Windows skills are limited.

How shall I proceed?
I think that it is important to get pg_test_fsync to work correctly on Windows,
and if my patch does not break the buildfarm, that's what it does.

I have attached a new version, the previous one was bit-rotted.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: cache lookup failed for constraint when alter table referred bypartition table
Next
From: Chris Travers
Date:
Subject: Re: Can I just reload the slave to change primary_conninfo?