Re: Loaded footgun open_datasync on Windows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: Loaded footgun open_datasync on Windows
Date
Msg-id 20180902000721.GA1794193@rfd.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Loaded footgun open_datasync on Windows  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: Loaded footgun open_datasync on Windows
Re: Loaded footgun open_datasync on Windows
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:09:24PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > I have added it to the July commitfest.
> > 
> > Have you looked at the possibility of removing the log file constraints
> > in pg_upgrade with the change you are doing here so as things would be
> > more consistent with non-Windows platforms, simplifying some code on the
> > way?
> 
> Can you explain what the "log file constraints" are?
> If it is in any way related, and I can handle it, sure.

See this comment in pg_upgrade.h:

/*
 * WIN32 files do not accept writes from multiple processes
 *
 * On Win32, we can't send both pg_upgrade output and command output to the
 * same file because we get the error: "The process cannot access the file
 * because it is being used by another process." so send the pg_ctl
 * command-line output to a new file, rather than into the server log file.
 * Ideally we could use UTILITY_LOG_FILE for this, but some Windows platforms
 * keep the pg_ctl output file open by the running postmaster, even after
 * pg_ctl exits.
 *
 * We could use the Windows pgwin32_open() flags to allow shared file
 * writes but is unclear how all other tools would use those flags, so
 * we just avoid it and log a little differently on Windows;  we adjust
 * the error message appropriately.
 */

If you grep src/bin/pg_upgrade for WIN32, roughly a third of the hits are
workarounds for this problem.  I agree with Michael that removing those
workarounds would be a good test of frontend pgwin32_open() and worth
including in the initial commit.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_verify_checksums and -fno-strict-aliasing
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: pread() and pwrite()