Re: pgsql-performance issue - Mailing list pgsql-performance

On 2016-08-20 12:19, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2016-08-20 14:17 GMT+02:00 <debasis.moharana@ipathsolutions.co.in>:
>
>> On 2016-08-20 12:05, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>> 2016-08-20 13:59 GMT+02:00 <debasis.moharana@ipathsolutions.co.in>:
>>
>> On 2016-08-20 11:42, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>> 2016-08-20 13:31 GMT+02:00 <debasis.moharana@ipathsolutions.co.in>:
>>
>> On 2016-08-20 08:58, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> 2016-08-20 10:27 GMT+02:00 <debasis.moharana@ipathsolutions.co.in>:
>>
>> On 2016-08-20 08:21, pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org wrote:
>>
>> Welcome to the pgsql-performance mailing list!
>> Your password at PostgreSQL Mailing Lists is
>>
>> x8DiA6
>>
>> To leave this mailing list, send the following command in the
>> body
>> of a message to majordomo@postgresql.org:
>>
>> approve x8DiA6 unsubscribe pgsql-performance
>> debasis.moharana@ipathsolutions.co.in
>>
>> This command will work even if your address changes. For that
>> reason,
>> among others, it is important that you keep a copy of this
>> message.
>>
>> To post a message to the mailing list, send it to
>> pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
>>
>> If you need help or have questions about the mailing list, please
>> contact the people who manage the list by sending a message to
>> pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org
>>
>> You can manage your subscription by visiting the following WWW
>> location:
>>
>>
> <https://lists.postgresql.org/mj/mj_wwwusr/domain=postgresql.org/debasis.moharana%40ipathsolutions.co.in
>> [1]
>> [1]
>>
>> [2]
>>
>> [1]>
>> Dear Sir/Mam,
>>
>> I have a PostgreSQL 9.5 instance running on Windows 8 machine with
>> 4GB of RAM.This server is mainly used for inserting/updating large
>> amounts of data via copy/insert/update commands, and seldom for
>> running select queries.
>>
>> Here are the relevant configuration parameters I changed:
>>
>> max_connections = 100
>> shared_buffers = 512MB
>> effective_cache_size = 3GB
>> work_mem = 12233kB
>> maintenance_work_mem = 256MB
>> min_wal_size = 1GB max_wal_size = 2GB
>> checkpoint_completion_target = 0.7
>> wal_buffers = 16MB
>> default_statistics_target = 100
>>
>> After setting in postgresql.conf. I run the select query to fetch
>> large amount of record of 29000 in postgresql but it takes 10.3
>> seconds but the same query takes 2 seconds for execution in MSSQL.
>>
>> So my query is how to improve the perfermance in postgresql.
>>
>> hi
>>
>> please, send execution plan of slow query
>>
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-explain.html
>> [2] [3]
>> [3]
>> [3]
>> https://explain.depesz.com/ [3] [4] [4] [4]
>>
>> p.s. Did you do VACUUM and ANALYZE on database?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Pavel
>>
>> Regards,
>> Debasis Moharana
>> .NET Software Developer
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list
>> (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance [4] [2] [1]
>> [2]
>>
>> Links:
>> ------
>> [1]
>>
>>
> https://lists.postgresql.org/mj/mj_wwwusr/domain=postgresql.org/debasis.moharana%40ipathsolutions.co.in
>> [1]
>> [1]
>> [2]
>> [2] http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance [4] [2]
>> [1]
>> [3]
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-explain.html [2]
>> [3]
>> [3]
>> [4] https://explain.depesz.com/ [3] [4] [4]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please check the execution plan details
>>
>> Execution Query is = EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) select * from
>> tblPurchaseOrderstock cross join tblPurchaseOrderInfo;
>>
>> "Nested Loop (cost=0.00..507.51 rows=39593 width=224) (actual
>> time=0.032..13.026 rows=39593 loops=1)"
>> " Buffers: shared read=8"
>> " I/O Timings: read=0.058"
>> " -> Seq Scan on tblpurchaseorderstock (cost=0.00..7.89
>> rows=289
>> width=95) (actual time=0.014..0.082 rows=289 loops=1)"
>> " Buffers: shared read=5"
>> " I/O Timings: read=0.040"
>> " -> Materialize (cost=0.00..5.05 rows=137 width=129) (actual
>> time=0.000..0.006 rows=137 loops=289)"
>> " Buffers: shared read=3"
>> " I/O Timings: read=0.019"
>> " -> Seq Scan on tblpurchaseorderinfo (cost=0.00..4.37
>> rows=137 width=129) (actual time=0.011..0.035 rows=137 loops=1)"
>> " Buffers: shared read=3"
>> " I/O Timings: read=0.019"
>> "Planning time: 56.052 ms"
>> "Execution time: 14.038 ms"
>>
>> It is same query? It needs only 14ms
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Pavel
>>
>> Regards,
>> Debasis Moharana
>>
>> Links:
>> ------
>> [1] http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance [4] [2]
>> [2]
>>
>>
> https://lists.postgresql.org/mj/mj_wwwusr/domain=postgresql.org/debasis.moharana%40ipathsolutions.co.in
>> [1]
>> [1]
>> [3]
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-explain.html [2]
>> [3]
>> [4] https://explain.depesz.com/ [3] [4]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Yes you right.But it will take more time(10.3 sec.) Plase check
>> the
>> snap.
>>
>> The real time you can see in EXPLAIN ANALYZE ... output. The some
>> strange time what you can see in PgAdmin can be based on
>>
>> a) PgAdmin issue - pgAdmin is relativly slow client due slow
>> formatting - the time of processing in your application can be
>> pretty
>> better, try to check another client
>>
>> b) there can be some network issues - the problem is in passing
>> data
>> from server to client
>>
>> but probably variant is @a - pgAdmin is not good for benchmarking -
>> use "psql" console instead.
>>
>> Pavel
>>
>> Can you please tell me what we need to setup so that it will take
>> the actual time.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Debasis Moharana
>>
>> Links:
>> ------
>> [1]
>>
> https://lists.postgresql.org/mj/mj_wwwusr/domain=postgresql.org/debasis.moharana%40ipathsolutions.co.in
>> [1]
>> [2] http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance [4]
>> [3] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-explain.html
>> [2]
>> [4] https://explain.depesz.com/ [3]
>
>  Hi,
>
>  Actually i am fresher on this.So want to connect my application with
> postgresql instead of MSSQL.
>
>  If we are using psql console for executing the query then it will
> faster according to you.
>  But what is the other option to use instead of pgadmin.
>
>  Can you give me some link for reference.
>
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Community_Guide_to_PostgreSQL_GUI_Tools
> [5]
> http://www.sqlmanager.net/en/products/postgresql/manager [6]
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
>> Regards,
>> Debasis Moharana
>
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1]
> https://lists.postgresql.org/mj/mj_wwwusr/domain=postgresql.org/debasis.moharana%40ipathsolutions.co.in
> [2] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-explain.html
> [3] https://explain.depesz.com/
> [4] http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
> [5]
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Community_Guide_to_PostgreSQL_GUI_Tools
> [6] http://www.sqlmanager.net/en/products/postgresql/manager


Hi,


Thanks a lot. its now faster execution of query.Let me check all the
things in postgresql.If i have any further query then i will get back to
you.
Regards,
Debasis Moharana