On 04.11.23 01:51, Andres Freund wrote:
> I'd just use a single test() invocation here, and add an argument to testwrap
> indicating that it should print out the skipped message. That way we a) don't
> need two test() invocations, b) could still see the test name etc in the test
> invocation.
Here is a patch that does it that way.