On 2023-11-15 11:02:19 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 04.11.23 01:51, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I'd just use a single test() invocation here, and add an argument to testwrap
> > indicating that it should print out the skipped message. That way we a) don't
> > need two test() invocations, b) could still see the test name etc in the test
> > invocation.
>
> Here is a patch that does it that way.
WFM!
