On 2025/04/09 19:24, Kirill Reshke wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 14:45, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2025/04/09 18:25, Kirill Reshke wrote:
>>> On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 13:23, jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> hi.
>>>>
>>>> we allow the "COPY table TO" command to copy rows from materialized
>>>> views in [1].
>>>> The attached patch is to add a tab complete for it.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://git.postgresql.org/cgit/postgresql.git/commit/?id=534874fac0b34535c9a5ab9257d6574f78423578
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>> Patch works good for me, but I noticed that psql COPY <tab> suggests
>>> partitioned relation both with and without this patch. Maybe that's
>>> not a big problem, if [0] will be pushed.
>>
>> Is the partitioned table currently tab-completed for the COPY FROM case?
>
> If I'm not mistaken, yes. I double checked.
>
>> INSTEAD OF INSERT triggers - though maybe that's overkill?
>
> That's wild to me, psql tab completions feature designed to support
> postgresql not fully, but in frequent cases. So maybe we should keep
> it stupud.
I agree that it's reasonable to exclude such rarely used objects from
tab-completion. How about including just tables, partitioned tables,
foreign tables, and materialized views?
I've attached a patch for that.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
