Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christoph Berg
Subject Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions
Date
Msg-id ZnqLYcAYTv3fKBmU@msg.df7cb.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Re: Nathan Bossart
> At first glance, the general idea seems reasonable to me.  I'm wondering
> whether there is a requirement for this directory to be prepended or if it
> could be appended to the end.  That way, the existing ones would take
> priority, which might be desirable from a security standpoint.

My use case for this is to test things at compile time (where I can't
write to /usr/share/postgresql/). If installed things would take
priority over the things that I'm trying to test, I'd be disappointed.

Christoph



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: Slow catchup of 2PC (twophase) transactions on replica in LR
Next
From: Jelte Fennema-Nio
Date:
Subject: Re: Partial aggregates pushdown