Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Using the %m printf format more - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Using the %m printf format more
Date
Msg-id ZfKhkpFHjOgDlYUB@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Using the %m printf format more  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
Responses Re: Using the %m printf format more
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 02:33:52PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The 0002 patch looks sensible.  It would be good to fix that, otherwise it
> could have some confusing outcomes in the future.

You mean if we begin to use %m in future callers of
emit_tap_output_v(), hypothetically?  That's a fair argument.
--
Michael
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: shveta malik
Date:
Subject: Re: Have pg_basebackup write "dbname" in "primary_conninfo"?
Next
From: "Anton A. Melnikov"
Date:
Subject: Re: May be BUG. Periodic burst growth of the checkpoint_req counter on replica.