Re: Using the %m printf format more - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Using the %m printf format more
Date
Msg-id 15807ada-c099-46bb-a073-bfc0a9357872@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Using the %m printf format more  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Using the %m printf format more
List pgsql-hackers
On 12.03.24 02:22, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 11:19:16AM +0000, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
>> On closer look, fprintf() is actually the only errno-clobbering function
>> it calls, I was just hedging my bets in that statement.
> 
> This makes the whole simpler, so I'd be OK with that.  I am wondering
> if others have opinions to offer about that.

The 0002 patch looks sensible.  It would be good to fix that, otherwise 
it could have some confusing outcomes in the future.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: Disabling Heap-Only Tuples
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring