Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr  8, 2025 at 10:13:46AM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 10:10 AM Wolfgang Walther
> <walther@technowledgy.de> wrote:
> > And if that means making libpq modular at run-time, then this should be planned and built with all deps, and other
use-cases(like static linking) in mind - and not like it is right now.
 
> 
> I think that'd be neat in concept, but specifically this thread is
> discussing a PG18 open item. For future releases, if we're happy with
> how Curl gets split out, maybe that would be fuel for other
> delay-loaded client dependencies. I'm not sure.

Well, if we think we are going to do that, it seems we would need a
different architecture than the one being proposed for PG 18, which
could lead to a lot of user/developer API churn.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.