Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 10:15 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Well, if we think we are going to do that, it seems we would need a
> different architecture than the one being proposed for PG 18, which
> could lead to a lot of user/developer API churn.

A major goal of the current patch proposal is to explicitly hide this
from the end-user and public APIs. So it can be changed without public
breakage. It can't be hidden from packagers, of course, but that's the
point of the feature request.

--Jacob