Re: Is this a problem in GenericXLogFinish()? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Is this a problem in GenericXLogFinish()?
Date
Msg-id ZTzpsFEV3DhlmxX5@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is this a problem in GenericXLogFinish()?  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Is this a problem in GenericXLogFinish()?
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 03:45:13PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Yes, we need it to exclude any concurrent in-progress scans that could
> return incorrect tuples during bucket squeeze operation.

Thanks.  So I assume that we should just set REGBUF_NO_CHANGE when the
primary and write buffers are the same and there are no tuples to
move.  Say with something like the attached?
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: jian he
Date:
Subject: Re: Issues with Information_schema.views
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: maybe a type_sanity. sql bug