Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
Date
Msg-id ZHpGx8I5ifDUZPaP@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Responses Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 10:35:43AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> I think we should avoid the is-defined-in dance and just pull out the version
> numbers for comparisons.  While it's true that LibreSSL doesn't play well with
> OpenSSL versions, they do define their own which can be checked for to
> distinguish the libraries.

Agreed.  How about tackling that in a separate patch?  At this stage,
I would like to not care about ./configure and do it only with meson,
but there is value in reporting the version number in ./configure to
see the version coverage in the buildfarm.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ankit Pandey
Date:
Subject: [Question] pgwal increasing over max_wal_size
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?