> On 2 Jun 2023, at 23:21, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 10:35:43AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> I think we should avoid the is-defined-in dance and just pull out the version
>> numbers for comparisons. While it's true that LibreSSL doesn't play well with
>> OpenSSL versions, they do define their own which can be checked for to
>> distinguish the libraries.
>
> Agreed. How about tackling that in a separate patch?
Absolutely, let's keep these goalposts in place and deal with that separately.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
