Re: shoud be get_extension_schema visible? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: shoud be get_extension_schema visible?
Date
Msg-id ZAWZ+6oc8Sp1lyWQ@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: shoud be get_extension_schema visible?  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: shoud be get_extension_schema visible?
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 08:34:49AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> Note for other reviewers / committers: this is a something actually already
>> wanted for 3rd party code.  As an example, here's Pavel's code in
>> plpgsql_check
>> extension that internally has to duplicate this function (and deal with
>> compatibility):
>> https://github.com/okbob/plpgsql_check/blob/master/src/catalog.c#L205

I can see why you'd want that, so OK from here to provide this routine
for external consumption.  Let's first wait a bit and see if others
have any kind of objections or comments.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Luzanov
Date:
Subject: Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM