Greetings,
* Peter Eisentraut (peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com) wrote:
> On 27.09.22 03:37, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Maybe we should rely on PATH, rather than hardcoding OS dependent locations?
> > Or at least fall back to seach binaries in PATH? Seems pretty odd to hardcode
> > all these locations without a way to influence it from outside the test.
>
> Homebrew intentionally does not install the krb5 and openldap packages into
> the path, because they conflict with macOS-provided software. However, those
> macOS-provided variants don't provide all the pieces we need for the tests.
The macOS-provided versions are also old and broken, or at least that
was the case when I looked into them last.
> Also, on Linux you need /usr/sbin, which is often not in the path.
>
> So I think there is no good way around hardcoding a lot of these paths.
Yeah, not sure what else to do.
Thanks,
Stephen
