Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name
Date
Msg-id YtYofMA6kkPn5byE@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name  (Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 10:58:26AM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Sounds great, looks fine. Thanks for your review.

Ok, cool.  At the end, I have decided to split the tests and the main
patch into two different commits, as each is useful on its own.  Doing
so also helps in seeing the difference of behavior when issuing a
REINDEX DATABASE.  Another thing that was itching me with the test is
that it was not possible to make the difference between the toast
index of the catalog and of the user table, so I have added the parent
table name as an extra thing stored in the table storing the
relfilenodes.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Doc about how to set max_wal_senders when setting minimal wal_level
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Rename some rel truncation related constants at the top of vacuumlazy.c