Re: Doc about how to set max_wal_senders when setting minimal wal_level - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: Doc about how to set max_wal_senders when setting minimal wal_level
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwa3XiFbeYOVb92vU+BCHXULsEWn03WnRR-qbHtuXXY5rg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Doc about how to set max_wal_senders when setting minimal wal_level  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 8:16 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 07:39:55PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 6:27 PM Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> +0.90
>
> Consider changing:
>
> "makes any base backups taken before this unusable"
>
> to:
>
> "makes existing base backups unusable"
>
> As I try to justify this, though, it isn't quite true, maybe:
>
> "makes point-in-time recovery, using existing base backups, unable to replay
> future WAL."

I went with simpler wording.


+1

Thanks!

David J.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Doc about how to set max_wal_senders when setting minimal wal_level
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name