On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 12:31:45PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jacob Champion <jchampion@timescale.com> writes:
>> Moving from lax to strict validation means plenty
>> of IETF spec reading to make sure we don't throw away useful hostnames
>> by accident.
>
> True. I'd be content to disallow '/' and move on.
It does not seem like this is strictly forbidden, either. This set of
rules would be RFC 1035, section 2.3, I guess:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1035
> Or we could just drop this test case.
I'd be fine with that. Disabling the SNI, as proposed upthread, would
also be fine.
--
Michael
