Jacob Champion <jchampion@timescale.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 9:16 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Why not? We're still in beta, and pretty early at that.
> Mostly just that the test failure isn't new behavior in 15,
... which raises the question of whether we should back-patch ...
> Moving from lax to strict validation means plenty
> of IETF spec reading to make sure we don't throw away useful hostnames
> by accident.
True. I'd be content to disallow '/' and move on.
Or we could just drop this test case.
regards, tom lane