Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set
Date
Msg-id YkZSgJ8tGy2tAWwf@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 09:49:50AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, let's go ahead with it and see what happens.  If it's too
> much of a mess we can always revert.

Okay, done after an extra round of self-review.  I have finished by
tweaking a couple of comments, and adjusted further TESTING to explain
what needs to be done to have a dump compatible with the test.  Let's
now see what goes wrong.
--
Michael
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: unlogged sequences
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Use "WAL segment" instead of "log segment" consistently in user-facing messages