Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set
Date
Msg-id YbgsLG0q4n9f0JBE@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 06:08:24PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> Seems like we might get away with making make -C contrib/pg_upgrade check and
> vcregress.pl upgradecheck do nothing?

You mean #contrib/#src/bin/# here, right?  I don't think that we have
any need to have "make -C" do nothing.  For vcregress.pl, we should
IMO just remove upgradecheck.

> For the common case of not testing cross-version stuff, pg_upgrade's tests
> would just be invoked via run_build.pl:run_bin_tests(). And TestUpgrade.pm
> should be fine with a test doing nothing.

Perhaps.  I am not sure what's the best picture here, TBH.  One
difference between the core stuff and the buldfarm is that in the case
of the buildfarm, we upgrade from a version that has not only the main
regression database, but everything from the contrib/ modules.

Speaking of which, I am going to send a patch for the buildfarm to be
able to use the SQL file from 0df9641, so as committers gain a bit
more control on the cross-version upgrade tests run by the buildfarm,
using the in-core code a maximum.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: row filtering for logical replication
Next
From: "osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Optionally automatically disable logical replication subscriptions on error