Hi,
On 2021-10-02 23:34:38 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> > On 10/2/21 5:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> IIUC, the only problem for a non-updated animal would be that it'd
> >> run the test twice? Or would it actually fail? If the latter,
> >> we'd need to sit on the patch rather longer.
>
> > The patch removes test.sh, so yes it would break.
>
> Maybe we could leave test.sh in place for awhile? I'd rather
> not cause a flag day for buildfarm owners. (Also, how do we
> see this working in the back branches?)
Seems like we might get away with making make -C contrib/pg_upgrade check and
vcregress.pl upgradecheck do nothing?
For the common case of not testing cross-version stuff, pg_upgrade's tests
would just be invoked via run_build.pl:run_bin_tests(). And TestUpgrade.pm
should be fine with a test doing nothing.
We'd not loose coverage with non-updated BF animals unless they have tap tests
disabled. Just the cross-version test would need timely work by buildfarm
operators - but I think Andrew could deal with that.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
