Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set
Date
Msg-id YWUTnXzvYXv1PMT9@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 09:04:47AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Keeping test.sh is not necessary - I mis-remembered what the test module
> does.

So..  Are people fine to remove entirely test.sh at the end, requiring
the tests of pg_upgrade to have TAP installed?  I'd rather raise the
bar here, as it would keep the code simpler in the tree in the long
term.  Or am I misunderstanding something?
--
Michael
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side