Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set
Date
Msg-id 39d5c0ab-43c8-b7a3-adb6-d252fafad7b4@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 10/10/21 10:07 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 03.10.21 09:03, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 11:34:38PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Maybe we could leave test.sh in place for awhile?  I'd rather
>>> not cause a flag day for buildfarm owners.  (Also, how do we
>>> see this working in the back branches?)
>>
>> I would be fine with test.sh staying around for now.
>
> test.sh could be changed to invoke the TAP test.


Keeping test.sh is not necessary - I mis-remembered what the test module
does.


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Error "initial slot snapshot too large" in create replication slot
Next
From: Greg Nancarrow
Date:
Subject: Re: Drop replslot after pgstat_shutdown cause assert coredump