On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 03:56:02PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> If the return from the first call is a subtransaction, the second call
> always obtain the top transaction. If the top transaction actualy did
> not exist, it's rather the correct behavior to cause SEGV, than
> creating a bogus rbtxn. THus it is wrong to set create=true and
> create_as_top=true. We could change the assertion like Assert (txn &&
> txn->base_snapshot) to make things clearer.
I don't see much the point to change this code. The result would be
the same: a PANIC at this location.
--
Michael
