Re: pg_config_h.in not up-to-date - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: pg_config_h.in not up-to-date
Date
Msg-id YC9qEd+zlRBItIyc@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_config_h.in not up-to-date  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_config_h.in not up-to-date
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 02:21:21AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> > Indeed, thanks.  It looks like a "git add" that was fat-fingered.  I
> > would like to make things more consistent with the attached.
>
> +1, but I think the first period in this comment is redundant:
>
> +  AC_DEFINE([USE_OPENSSL], 1, [Define to 1 to build with OpenSSL support. (--with-ssl=openssl).])

I guess that you mean the second period here to be more consistent
with the others?  That would mean the following diff:
+  AC_DEFINE([USE_OPENSSL], 1, [Define to 1 to build with OpenSSL support. (--with-ssl=openssl)])
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Tid scan improvements