Re: pg_config_h.in not up-to-date - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_config_h.in not up-to-date
Date
Msg-id 3026887.1613746642@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_config_h.in not up-to-date  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 02:21:21AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> +1, but I think the first period in this comment is redundant:
>> +  AC_DEFINE([USE_OPENSSL], 1, [Define to 1 to build with OpenSSL support. (--with-ssl=openssl).])

> I guess that you mean the second period here to be more consistent
> with the others?  That would mean the following diff:
> +  AC_DEFINE([USE_OPENSSL], 1, [Define to 1 to build with OpenSSL support. (--with-ssl=openssl)])

Hm.  It should be consistent with the rest, for sure.  Personally I'd put
the only period at the end, but I suppose we should stick with the
prevailing style if there is one.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Finding cause of test fails on the cfbot site
Next
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: Extensibility of the PostgreSQL wire protocol