On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 05:53:46PM +0100, Vik Fearing wrote:
> I think this is a pretty terrible idea. If we want that kind of behavior,
> we should just allow the GROUP BY to be omitted since without grouping sets,
> it is kind of redundant anyway.
>
> I don't know what my opinion is on that.
This is a very interesting concept. Because Postgres requires GROUP BY
of all non-aggregate columns of a target list, Postgres could certainly
automatically generate the GROUP BY. However, readers of the query
might not easily distinguish function calls from aggregates, so in a way
the GROUP BY is for the reader, not for the database server.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Embrace your flaws. They make you human, rather than perfect,
which you will never be.
