RE: [Proposal] Add foreign-server health checks infrastructure - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
Subject RE: [Proposal] Add foreign-server health checks infrastructure
Date
Msg-id TYCPR01MB569331643314B5129312C332F5B42@TYCPR01MB5693.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Proposal] Add foreign-server health checks infrastructure  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Responses RE: [Proposal] Add foreign-server health checks infrastructure
List pgsql-hackers
Dear Fujii-san,

> 
> Thanks for updating the patches!
> 
> I’ve created a new base patch and split the v42-0001 patch into two parts
> to implement the feature and improvements step by step. After pushing these
> patches, I’ll focus on the v42-0002 patch next.

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
> 
> I’ve attached the three patches.
> 
> v43-0001:
> This new patch enhances documentation for postgres_fdw_get_connections()
> output columns. The output columns were documented in text format,
> which is manageable for the current two columns. However, upcoming patches
> will add new columns, making text descriptions less readable.
> This patch updates the documentation to use a table format,
> making it easier for users to understand each output column.
> 
> v43-0002:
> This patch adds the "used_in_xact" column to postgres_fdw_get_connections().
> It separates this change from the original v42-0001 patch for clarity.
> 
> v43-0003
> This patch adds the "closed" column to postgres_fdw_get_connections().
> 
> I’ve also made several code improvements, for example adding a typedef for
> pgfdwVersion to simplify its usage, and updated typedefs.list.
> 
> +enum pgfdwVersion
> +{
> +    PGFDW_V1_0 = 0,
> +    PGFDW_V1_2,
> +}            pgfdwVersion;
> 
> Regards,
> 
> --
> Fujii Masao
> Advanced Computing Technology Center
> Research and Development Headquarters
> NTT DATA CORPORATION

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add more SQL/JSON constructor functions
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical Replication of sequences