RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: WALWriteLocks - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Godfrin, Philippe E
Subject RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: WALWriteLocks
Date
Msg-id SA0PR15MB393305277D4E7BF535F91CA4825F9@SA0PR15MB3933.namprd15.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WALWriteLocks  (Don Seiler <don@seiler.us>)
List pgsql-admin

Have you thought about commit_delay and siblings?

pg

 

From: Don Seiler <don@seiler.us>
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2021 11:12 AM
To: laurenz.albe@cybertec.at
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: WALWriteLocks

 

Use caution when interacting with this [EXTERNAL] email!

 


On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 1:38 AM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:

My gues is that you have too many active client connections, and you are suffering
from contention between the many backends that all want to write WAL.

In that case, use a connection pool to limit the number of active connections.

 

We do have pgbouncer in place already.

 

Thanks for the replies so far.

 

What I really want to know in this case is if there is some other PG operation that accounts for a WALWriteLock wait, or is it always an I/O (write) to the WAL file storage, and we can focus our investigation there? 

 

Don.

 

--

Don Seiler
www.seiler.us

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Vijaykumar Jain
Date:
Subject: Re: WALWriteLocks
Next
From: james terris
Date:
Subject: FATAL error in logs: no pb_hba.conf entry