Re: Is `#!/bin/sh' configurable? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Klimov
Subject Re: Is `#!/bin/sh' configurable?
Date
Msg-id Pine.SUN.4.21.0105101246500.23309-100000@dardar.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is `#!/bin/sh' configurable?  (Doug McNaught <doug@wireboard.com>)
Responses Re: Re: Is `#!/bin/sh' configurable?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 8 May 2001, Doug McNaught wrote:

> Alexander Klimov <ask@wisdom.weizmann.ac.il> writes:
> 
> > Hi.
> > 
> > On some systems /bin/sh is not Burne Shell, e.g. /bin/sh is tcsh, but
> 
> *violent retching sounds*
> 
> IMHO, any system where /bin/sh doesn't point to an at-least-somewhat
> Bourne-compatible shell is broken by definition...  Who perpetrated
> this atrocity?

Sorry, I was misleaded by
>sh -c 'echo $SHELL'
/bin/tcsh

The /bin/sh is sh, but not SysV compatible -- there is /bin/sh5 for that.

Regards,
ASK



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: RE: Outstanding patches
Next
From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Date:
Subject: AW: Coping with huge deferred-trigger lists